I've Been Wrong Before

It's horrible when you're wrong. People say that it takes real character if you're strong enough to admit you're wrong. So how come I don't feel fantastic?

In September 2015 Jeremy Corbyn became elected leader of the Labour Party with a huge 59.48% share of the vote. I had voted against him. My main problem was that I believed that Jeremy Corbyn was not leadership material, and was not electable.

After the EU referendum, Labour MP's passed a vote of no confidence in Jeremy Corbyn. In September 2016, Jeremy confounded the pundits by not only winning his second leadership contest in a year, but also securing a higher 61.8% share of the vote. During this contest I had been in a Labour Party meeting speaking up for his opponent, Owen Smith, to be elected as leader of the Labour Party.

So I had voted against Jeremy twice. I can't have been proved more wrong.


Over the last few weeks of this snap election, Jeremy Corbyn has proved that he is, in fact, a leader and capable of great statesmanship. He never raised his voice and he has always adhered to attacking policy decisions by the Tory government rather than personalities. Little wonder he has been and is now doing well in the polls. People now seem to be seeing his 'politics of hope' message.

It's a strange outcome for a general election where neither party has won. The Tories have won, in respect of the amount of votes cast. However, Jeremy has achieved 41% of the vote, which would have, in normal circumstances, delivered him to Number 10 with a comfortable majority. It gets more bizarre in that Theresa May actually won more votes than was won by David Cameron in the 2015 general election, which delivered a small majority of 5 seats.

So what has happened is a disaster. Theresa May sought to increase her majority by gambling on a snap election. She clearly didn't take into account how people might react to an exercise that seemed less than genuine in seeking a mandate. Judging by the growing popularity of Jeremy Corbyn's Labour Party, people don't buy Theresa May's desire for continuity as a reason for staying at number 10. Add a very frightening manifesto for older people and it's easy to see why the result is a no-score draw.

It gets worse. Theresa May is now obliged to form a government with the DUP. A party which is extreme. Opposed to gay marriage, climate change and equal rights. Their thuggish, bigoted views have no place here in a much more free and liberal Britain. Even more serious than that, the DUP is one of the involved parties in the Northern Ireland Peace process. This Tory/DUP partnership explodes the UK government's impartiality that is crucial if it is to continue to broker the Northern Ireland peace process.

What is so important about Theresa May's government that it needs to flirt with both a circumvention of democracy (however temporary it may be) and also risk inflaming the DUP's political opponents?

No. This is simply a price that is not worth paying. We not only prostitute our democracy, our core principles, our ethics but we also gravely risk our continuing peace.